1media/SB483C5A51905-007_thumb.jpg2023-07-21T10:01:21-05:00Kate Flynn89ab0aeaf9441ebcfe2d9d020d3b00b0ffd82873137Title page from Special Park Commission. Report of the Special Park Commission to the City Council of Chicago on the Subject of a Metropolitan Park System. Chicago: W. J. Harman, 1905. Special Collections & University Archives, University of Illinois Chicago Library.plain2023-09-15T15:24:45-05:001905Dan Harpereff3db32ed95b3efe91d381826e2c10c145cd452
This page is referenced by:
12021-01-19T16:48:26-06:00The Metropolitan Park Report, 190516plain2023-11-03T10:28:30-05:00After years of research, the Special Park Commission published its findings in early 1905. The "Metropolitan Park Report" consisted of seven parts:
Historical sketches of recreational spaces in Chicago
Comparisons between Chicago and other American and European cities
Statement of the park problem for Chicagoans
Proposals for the preserve and park system
Proposal for administrative control of the district
Reports from landscape architects and their proposals
Recommendations for park and playground sites in the city
Perhaps the most striking part of the report was its insistence that the paucity of park space contributed to the moral and physical decline of city residents. The lack of parks, Perkins and Jensen argued, harmed public health. With the population growth rate for the city estimated at more than seven percent annually, they projected that the future population of Chicago and Cook County would rise to somewhere between five and thirteen million by 1952. Reformers needed to work fast to prepare the metropolitan region for future Chicagoans and avoid what Perkins and Jensen feared would be high rates of death and crime.
The "Metropolitan Park Report" included a number of compromises between those who wanted to implement a boulevard system and those who wanted to keep nature as intact as possible. It noted that the area farthest from the city along the Skokie and Des Plaines Rivers offered the greatest opportunity for preservation. Perkins wrote in the report that “Man’s [minor] interference with the forest is visible everywhere, and this has in many instances produced a picturesqueness that has rendered some tracts most beautiful and established a precedent that should be encouraged.” According to Perkins, however, landowners, and especially farmers, had defaced much of the forest. Sounding a note of urgency, he said, ”The bad habit of some owners of annually burning down the undergrowth so they can ‘see through,’ shows its ruinous effect.” He added that the “Severe thinning out of the forest for pasture purposes, especially where oak predominates, has in some instances shown its damaging influences and the once luxuriant forest is gradually dying out.”
12021-01-27T12:41:30-06:00Municipal Science Club and Special Park Commission8plain2023-09-29T14:57:22-05:00In the 1890s, the Municipal Science Club organized the social, political, and economic elite to promote urban parks, playgrounds, and recreational spaces. Most notably, the club invited Jacob Riis to speak at Hull-House about the dangers of the overcrowded urban environment. This meeting led to the City Council’s creation of the Special Park Commission in 1899, on which many Municipal Science Club members, including Dwight Perkins and Jens Jensen, served. The Commission studied Chicago’s existing open spaces, called for more playgrounds, and worked to create a systematic plan for recreational spaces across the city. It was the Special Parks Commission that published the Metropolitan Park Report in 1905.